The Eastern Conference Standings as of 3/5/2008
1. Pittsburgh | 68 | 83 | |
2. Montreal | 67 | 81 | |
3. Carolina | 68 | 73 | |
4. New Jersey | 67 | 82 | |
5. Ottawa | 67 | 80 | |
6. Boston | 66 | 77 | |
7. N.Y. Rangers | 67 | 77 | |
8. Philadelphia | 67 | 74 | |
9. Buffalo | 67 | 73 | |
10. N.Y. Islanders | 68 | 71 | |
11. Washington | 67 | 70 | |
12. Toronto | 68 | 68 | |
13. Florida | 69 | 68 | |
14. Atlanta | 67 | 65 | |
15. Tampa Bay | 66 | 5 |
Ok we'll now break it down with Regulation wins as 3 points, OT/Shootout wins as 2 points, and OT/Shootout losses as 1 point. We'll only go to 11, since I have limited time.
- Ottawa 111 points
- Pittsburgh 110 points
- Carolina 99 Points
- Montreal 109 Points
- New Jersey 108 Points
- Philadelphia 104 Points
- Boston 104 Points
- NY Rangers 103 Points
- Buffalo 99 Points
- NY Islanders 94 Points
- Washington 93 Points
Well I guess Jeremy White was right, about being 4 points back, but with the 3 point structure. A four point lead isn't as daunting as it may seem. But still the early part of the season is catching up to the Sabres right now. Starting 6-10-1 in the first 17 really put them in a early hole. Of course Ottawa was 15-2 in their first 17 games. Now the Sabres have gained 10 points on the Sens since their first meeting.
So the conclusion to this study is, the system is fine where it is. It really doesn't make much of a difference. Things even out over 82 games.
1 comment:
The only change I would make to the system is make a win all or nothing. If you win, you get 2 points, you lose you get nothing. No matter if the win comes in regulation, overtime, or a shootout.
Post a Comment